Then he came back and did it again.
'Can you stop your child from hitting my son?' we asked, loudly enough for everyone to hear.
Charlie wasn't hurt, or even that bothered. But the boy's mother dragged him over to our table and told him to apologise.
Then it began.
Charlie sat there and waited. All four adults at our table sat there and waited. The boy's mother crouched next to him and told him, goaded him, asked him, pressed him and nagged him to say sorry. But the boy did nothing. He didn't move his lips, he stared anywhere but at Charlie, at the wall, into the middle distance. He leant back into his mother, snaking his little arms up around for a cuddle, a hug, a chance to bury his face, and each time he was gently unhooked and told to say sorry. He was immediately ready to move onto the part where he was assured that everything he did was okay. This went on for minute after minute. No one spoke but his mother. There were no tears, no raised voices, just firm whispering and denied affection. The closest the kid got to verbalising anything was trying to kiss Mummy's ear.
Waiters squeezed by, Charlie became bored and still the snuggling and whispering went on. And on. Still the whispering and urging went on. The tone never changed, neither did the boy's facial expression - if vacant denial can be called an expression.
Finally, I think he managed to mutter 'sorry' to Charlie audibly enough that the ordeal ended. Hugs all round. Hand-holding, playing with cars, kissing goodbyes and the other table left.
Here are your questions for discussion:
- Why did it take five minutes of snuggling and explaining to get a kid to say sorry?
- How does a kid with no other obvious social impairments arrive at the idea to repeatedly hit another kid his own age?
- Why was saying sorry to someone's face the worst thing that could happen to that kid, as opposed to say, anything else?
- Are there any moral downsides to teaching your offspring to, when physically abused, retaliate with a single jab to the nose and a threatening catch-phrase, ie. "Don't mess with the Moose, motherfucker"?
1. because the kid is a 5hit
ReplyDelete2. because the kid is a 5hit
3. because the kid is a 5hit
4. not when the kid is a 5hit
No moral downsides, but perhaps the jab should be on the arm or shoulder, not the nose which is likely to spurt blood and cause the mother to freak out and start yelling about assault.
ReplyDeleteMaybe begin with a "don't hit me, let's just play with the car", instead. Keep the jab as a last resort.
I've had a think about this.
ReplyDeleteMany years ago, in the schoolyard, if a little boy liked a little girl, he'd punch her on the arm.
Maybe this little boy was using this method of getting Charlie's attention, saying hello in his own way. Maybe when is dad arrived home every day he'd fist bump (gently) his wife on the arm and say "I'm home". Maybe that's all the kid knows so he didn't want to say sorry when he didn't think he'd done anything wrong.
On the other hand, if he was just hitting Charlie, my above statement stands.
I've had a think about this too and it wasn't a clumsy behaviour, or a condoned one. That kid meant to hit. Kids do this and experiment all the time with power and how much they can get away with. Charlie even went through a (very very very short-lived) hitting phase. All the kids at his child-care do. He'll probably grow out of it. Probably.
DeleteBut the fact that he tried cuddle his way out of it, says (I think) way more about the parent than the kid. Plus the fact that he was allowed to try to ignore his way out of it for so long.
To paraphrase the visiting Chinese principals on The Simpsons after a botched fireworks display:
"Bad student."
"No no. Bad principal."
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete